![]() ![]() There is a vague general sense that the space race and the U.S. The connection of the great advances made in these fields to the federal space-race effort can easily be overstated. They are concentrated in two large areas: computers and information technology (IT), and biotechnology and medicine. The scientific benefits reaped by the nation since the 1960s are well known. All told, the United States spent about $30 billion on the space race from the time the Soviet Union launched its Sputnik satellite in 1957 until the moon landing in 1969. Spending did not reach this level again until 1980 and never again in inflation-adjusted terms for the remainder of the Cold War. Outlays on space and science went from $0 in 1948 to more than $100 million in 1957 and peaking at $7 billion in 1967. space program, especially in the 1960s, was considerable and characterized by almost unheard-of rates of growth. Note that the arguments in this essay are not the personal views of the scholars but are illustrative of larger historical debates.įederal spending on the U.S. ![]() Then, complete the comparison questions that follow. Read the two arguments in response to the question posed, paying close attention to the supporting evidence and reasoning used for each. Was the federal spending on the space race justified or was it a misallocation of money that could be better spent elsewhere? Instructions Use this point-counterpoint with the Sputnik and NASA Narrative to have students analyze the creation of NASA and its role in the Cold War.Written by: (Claim A) Brian Domitrovic, Sam Houston State University (Claim B) Jeff Broadwater, Barton College Suggested Sequencing
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |